Quando la buona convivenza organizzativa si trasforma in convivenza sociale. Il caso del Circolo dei Talenti
Abstract
When Positive Organizational Coexistence Turns Itself into Social Coexistence. The case of Circolo dei Talenti
In the contemporary age, where individualism and mutual distrust are widespread among people, society is “liquid” and disoriented, the so-called intermediate units (groups, associations) promoting a positive coexistence within the organization itself are able to sustain positive coexistence in local communities too. The present contribution describes the Circolo dei talenti, an example of such an intermediate unit located in a peripheral neighborhood of a metropolitan area in Northern Italy. This case study shows how the development of a positive organizational coexistence has become the mean of community development and a better coexistence within the neighborhood. Qualitative and quantitative data show that the relational aspect is crucial in the Circolo dei talenti because it promotes authentic exchange and sharing behaviors among people, sustaining participation and social cohesion against self-referential habits and isolation. Although at this moment the Circolo dei Talenti is functioning mostly on an affiliative coexistence among members, seeds of a more generative coexistence are clearly detectable.
Keyword
Full Text
PDF - ARTICOLORiferimenti bibliografici
Amerio P., (2013), L’altro necessario, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Ardoino J. , Barus-Michel J., (2005), Soggetto . In Dizionario di psicosociologia , ( a cura di) Barus-Michel J., Enriquez E., Levy, A., Cortina, Milano, 273-280.
Bauman Z., (2001), The individualized society, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bourdieu P., (1980), Le capital social. Notes provisoires. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31,2-3
Bronfenbrenner U., (1979), The ecology of human development, Harvard Press, Cambridge.
Ceretti A., Cornelli R., (2013), Oltre la paura, Milano: Feltrinelli.
Coleman J.S , (1990), Foundations of social theory, Harvard University , Cambridge .
Creswell J. W., Plano Clark V. L., (2011), Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.), Sage., Thousand Oaks, CA.
Dalton J. H., Elias M.J., Wandersman A., (2001), Community Psychology: Linking Individuals and Communitie, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont.
De Piccoli N., Bosi B., Colombo M., Fedi A., Greganti K., Mosso C. ,Tartaglia S. (2004), Dall’attore sociale al cittadino partecipante: Una riflessione, in Psicologia sociale in dialogo, (a cura di) De Piccoli N. , Quaglino G.P., Edizione Unicopli, Milano, 87-99.
Di Maria F., (a cura di), (2000), Psicologia della convivenza. Soggettività e socialità, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Di Maria F., Lavanco G., (2002), Culture di gruppo, Masson, Milano.
Donati P., (2003), La famiglia come capitale sociale primario, in Famiglia e capitale sociale nella società italiana, (a cura di) Donati P., Edizioni San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo, pp. 31-101.
Fukuyama F ., (2000), Social Capital and Civil Society, IMF Working Paper.
Lavanco G. , Romano F., (2006), La ricerca intervento partecipato e lo sviluppo di comunità con gli adolescenti, Psicologia di Comunità, 2, 97-105.
Mannarini T., (2004), Comunità e partecipazione, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Mannarini T., Fedi A., (2009), Multiple senses of community: The experience and meaning of community, Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 211–227.
McMillan D., Chavis D., (1986), Sense of community: A definition and theory, Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–22.
Marta E., Pozzi M., (2006), Young volunteers, family and social capital: from the care of family bonds to the care of community bonds, in Citizenship education: youth theory, research and practice, (a cura di) Hofer M., Sliwka A., Diedrich M., Waxmann, Münster/ New York, 97-108.
Martini. E.R, (1999), La comunità locale, Carocci, Roma.
Mazzoli G., Spadoni N., (2009), Piccole imprese globali. Una comunità locale costruisce servizi per le famiglie, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Moro G., (1998), Manuale di cittadinanza attiva , Carocci, Roma.
Prezza M., Pacilli M.G., Barbaranelli C., Zampatti E. (2009), The MTSOCS: a multidimensional sense of community scale for local communities, Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 305-326.
Pulcini E., (2002), L’Io globale: crisi del legame sociale, in Filosofie della globalizzazione, (a cura di), D’Andrea D., Pulcini E., Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 57-83.
Putnam R. D., (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Rappaport J. (1981), In Praise of Paradox: a Social Policy of Empowerment over Prevention, American Journal of Community Psychology, 1, 1-25.
Rappaport J., (1984), Studies in Empowerment: Introduction to the issue, Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1-7.
Riesman D., Glazer N., Denney R. (2001), The lonely crowd: a study of the changing American character, Yale University Press, Yale.
Rossi G., Boccaccin L., (2006), Il capitale sociale in un'organizzazione multilivello di terzo settore, Franco Angeli: Milano.
Sarason S.B., (1974), The Psychological Sense of Community: Prospects for a Community Psychology, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Tajfel H., Billig M., Bundy, R.P., Flament C. (1971), Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
Woolcock M., (1999), Social capital. The state of the notion, Global and Local Perspective, 4, 15-40.
Refback
- Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
......................................................................................................................................................................................
Editore: Giuseppe Licari dal 2013 - piazza Lodi 4, 26100 Cremona
Rivista scientifica ISSN: 2281-8960 - registrata presso il Tribunale di Cremona: registro stampa n° 323/2013.